The Committee considered Development Services Department report, DSD-2024-329, dated July 18, 2024, recommending adoption of Official Plan Amendment Application OPA24/006/W/TS, and adoption of Zoning By-law Amendment Application ZBA24/006/W/TS, for the properties municipally addressed as 1036, 1082 and 1094 Wilson Avenue.
It was noted a written submission was received by N. Taylor.
T. Seyler, Senior Planner presented an overview of the report. G. Stevenson, Director of Development and Housing Approvals was also in attendance to respond to questions from the Committee.
K. Barisdale, GSP Group was in attendance in support of the staff recommendation. S. Congdon, Colt Canada, was also in attendance to respond to questions from the Committee.
K. Barisdale responded to questions from the Committee regarding the potential disruption of the nearby greenspace, and surroundings. K. Barisdale noted that there are two existing driveways on-site that have already been disturbed, and stated the site plan process will address measures related to sediment erosion control and tree protection.
In response to further questions, K. Barisdale noted the applicant's willingness to work with the City to facilitate any requests regarding enhancements along Wilson Avenue, such as curbside improvements and parking.
K. Barisdale stated in response to additional questions that the two residential dwelling units on the property appeared to originally be family homes with three-bedrooms, and have been vacant for several years. K. Barisdale noted there are also two accessory buildings associated with 1084 Wilson Avenue, that were former barns or outdoor facilities.
In response to further questions, K. Barisdale reported that a private heritage consultant, in conjunction with the City’s heritage consultants, assessed the heritage value of the existing, "log wall" at the property. It was noted the wall had undergone significant modifications, was heavily deteriorated, and had lost much of its heritage value due to the various changes over time.
K. Barisdale addressed questions concerning the potential requirement for a traffic impact study, and noted it was not required by the city for this project, at this time.
In response to questions regarding lighting surrounding the proposed parking area and trail, K. Barisdale indicated that no additional lighting along the public trail is being proposed at this time.
S. Congdon stated the proposed amendments support the expansion of an existing industrial property and will add approximately 50 new jobs to the region.
N. Taylor and S. Mackenzie were in attendance in opposition to the staff recommendation, noting concerns related to the loss of two residential homes, potential for traffic along Wilson Avenue, impacts on the surrounding natural heritage features, as well as noise and lighting disturbances.
G. Stevenson clarified that the site plan review process will address technical aspects of the application, including but not limited to, photometric plans that consider the impact of any proposed lighting and permeable paving options.
In response to further questions, T. Seyler confirmed that the comments from Grand River Conservation Authority have been considered and addressed.